Florensky and Flaubert: Anticipating French Theory

Aim. To demonstrate how P. A. Florensky’s philological legacy anticipated the French theory approach (R. Barthes, M. Foucault) to Flaubert’s oeuvre.
Methodology. The study employs comparative historical analysis with elements of close reading. Florensky’s thought is described within contemporaneous intellectual debates, which are then juxta posed with discussions in French theory. Biographical circumstances are considered as sources of philological inspiration, emphasizing that during pivotal historical periods, this existential subtext of literary reflection may come to the forefront.
Results. The analysis reveals that Florensky’s approach to Flaubert’s visuality constitutes a systematic philological examination that accounts for the generic specificities of hagiographic literature and realist 
narrative, as well as the lived embodiments of these scripts. For Florensky, as well as for French theorists, the world is a text which may abruptly manifest itself in in the destinies of people under certain conditions. However, while French theorists correlated text with other texts, Florensky aligned it with ritual.
Research implication. It has been shown that the hermeneutic method of Russian religious philosophy 
reveals various scenarios of redemption, which makes clarification of the relationship between the author and the hero in aesthetic production possible.

1. Isupov, K. G., comp. (2001). P. A. Florensky: Pro et Contra: The Personality and Works of Pavel Florensky in the Evaluation of Russian Thinkers and Researchers. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy publ. (in Russ.).

2. Florensky, P. A. (1994). Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl publ. (in Russ.).

3. Zhukova, M. V. (2023). An Intertextual Approach to Study P. A. Florensky’s Works. In: History of Philosophy, 28 (1), 54–66. DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2023-28-1-54-66 (in Russ.).

4. Miroshnichenko, E. I. (2022). The Internal Form of Abstruse Language: P. A. Florensky’s Humboldtian Paradigm Considering I. Terentyev and I. Zdanevich’s Theoretical Works. In: Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 6 (1), 253–277 (in Russ.).

5. Zhernokleev, D. A. (2021). Bakhtin on Flaubert: The Poetics of the “Negating Image.” In: The Journal of Literary History and Theory, 4 (54), 166–178. DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2021.54.10 (in Russ.).

6. Semenyuk, A. P. (2009). The Space of Worldview in Russian Religious Philosophy of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries. In: Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 324, 102–108 (in Russ.).

7. Turysheva, O. N. & Chichkina, M. V. (2017). The Ekphrastic Principle in G. Flaubert’s Drama “The Temptation of Saint Anthony.” In: Paverman’s Readings. Literature. Music. Theatre: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Doctor of Philological Sciences, Prof. V. M. Paverman (Ekaterinburg, November 8, 2016). Iss. 3. Moscow: Cabinet Scholar publ., 49–59 (in Russ.).

8. Bart, R. (2001). S/Z. Moscow: Editorial URSS publ. (in Russ.).

9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Psychology of Art. Rostov on Don: Phoenix publ. (in Russ.).

10. Belinsky, V. G. (1956). “Hamlet”, a Drama by Shakespeare. Mochalov as Hamlet. Moscow: Goslitizdat publ. (in Russ.).

11. Foucault, M. (2018). Fantastic Library: On Gustave Flaubert’s “The Temptation of Saint Anthony.” Moscow: V-A-C publ., Center for Experimental Museology publ. (in Russ.).

12. Kristeva, Yu. (2003). Forces of Horror: An Essay on Disgust. St. Petersburg: Aletheia publ. (in Russ.)