On The Peculiarities of O. E. Mandelstam’s Idiostyle: Perusing the Poet’s Prose
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5008-2025-6-41-49
Abstract
Aim. To identify and characterize the idiostyle features that can be observed in O. E. Mandelstam’s autobiographical prose texts about his travels through Armenia.
Methodology. The study utilized targeted sampling, descriptive-analytical methods, conceptual methods, comparative analysis, linguocultural methods, and dictionary definitions.
Results. The lexical and linguistic features of the author’s autobiographical prose are analyzed. Through the study of his journalistic and autobiographical works and research on the author’s language and
style, key features of O. E. Mandelstam’s idiostyle were identified – the use of Armenian cultural imag
ery and the exotic lexemes that embody them to convey the travel theme and express attitudes toward
seen things.
Research implications. The materials of the article and the obtained results can be used in both the
study of the idiostyle and idiolect of O. E. Mandelstam and in teaching the linguistic disciplines such as
“Stylistics of the Russian language” and “Language of Fiction.”
About the Author
V. A. GalstyanРоссия
Vergine A. Galstyan – Postgraduate Student, Department of Modern Russian Language named after Prof. P. A. Lekant
Moscow
References
1. Fomenko, E. G. (2006). Problems of Linguistic Typological Description of a Writer’s Idiostyle. In: Bulletin of Pomor University, 2, 95–102 (in Russ.).
2. Potsepnya, D. M. (1997). The World Image in a Writer’s Word. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University publ. (in Russ.).
3. Loshakov, A. G., Papusha, I. S., Beglova, E. I., Boitsova, O. Yu., Shirinyants, A. A., Gutorov, V. A., Khalikova, N. V., Simashko, T. V., Shvetsova, V. M., Gerasimenko, N. A., Shapovalova, T. E., Muratova, E. Yu., Akulova, A. A., Ledeneva, V. V., Artamonova, Yu. D. Does a Text Keep Being a Text? (Round Table). In: Bulletin of Moscow Region State University (e-journal), 2017, 2. URL: www.evestnikmgou.ru (acessed:15.04.2025) (in Russ.).
4. Semenko, I. M. (1997). Poetics of the Late Mandelstam. Moscow: Your Choice publ. (in Russ.).
5. Averintsev, S. (2011). We are the Meaning-Makers... In: Averintsev and Mandelstam. Notes from the Mandelstam Society. Iss. 17. Moscow: RSUH publ., pp. 19–24 (in Russ.).
6. Brusilovskaya, L. B. (2023). “It is Tempting to Understand and Difficult to Interpret”: S. S. Averintsev – A Researcher of O. Mandelstam’s Works. In: RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series, 7–2, 179–187. DOI: 10.28995/2686-7249-2023-7-179-187 (in Russ.).
7. Vekshin, G. V. & Lemesheva, M. M. (2019). Semantics of Poetism and Poetic Discourse (From the Experience of Working on the “Living Stylistic Dictionary of the Russian Language”). In: Russian Philology: Scientific Notes of Smolensk State University, 19, 368–389 (in Russ.).
8. Ledeneva, V. V. (2022). Features of N. S. Leskov’s Idiolect. Moscow: Postator publ. (in Russ.).
9. Golubeva, A. A. (2024). The Image of Language as a Basic Value of the People in O. E. Mandelstam’s Works (Based on the Cycle “Armenia”). In: Word and Culture without Borders: Axiological Aspect. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the RAS publ., pp. 47–53 (in Russ.).
10. Shuvaeva-Petrosyan, E. & Mandelstam, O. E. (2019). Armenian Text (On the 80th Anniversary of His Death). In: Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science, 4 (2), 92–99 (in Russ.).
11. Melnikova, E. M. (2003). Function Features of Metaphor in O. Mandelstam’s Prose. In: Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 1, 53–55 (in Russ.).
12. Golubeva, A. A. & Sudakova, G. V. (2020). Speech Images of the World’s Languages in O. E. Mandelstam’s Poetry. In: Bulletin of Vologda State University. Series History and Philology, 3 (18), 77–84 (in Russ.).
13. Zhuchkova, A. V. (2014). The Hypnotic Language of O. Mandelstam’s Poetry. In: Lomonosov Philology Journal, 2, 153–168 (in Russ.)
Supplementary files
Review
JATS XML























