Literary Relations of Ya. B. Knyazhnin and N. P. Nikolev: On the Motives of Literary Polemics

Aim. To consider the literary relations of Ya. B. Knyazhnin and N. P. Nikolev who are the significant playwrights of the second half of the 18^th century, analyzing the possible causes and consequences of the ideological and interpersonal conflict that existed between the writers, expressed in their artistic works.

Methodology of the work is based on the use of cultural, historical and biographical approaches. The main content of the article is devoted to a comparative examination of the texts by Knyazhnin and Nikolev, that makes the study the chronology of the development of literary relations between the authors possible.

Results. The article outlines the reasons for the literary rivalry that has arisen between the authors. Among the most significant reasons is the desire of Knyazhnin to stand up for Sumarokov, who was satirized by Nikolev. For Knyazhnin, Sumarokov’s son-in-law, this could have had not only ideological, but also personal reasons. On the other hand, it is concluded that the literary polemics of the authors were peculiar to the literary process of the second half of the 18^th century and could not have been based on interpersonal conflict at all.

Research implications of the study consist in the fact that the topic of literary relations between Knyazhnin and Nikolev was never considered in a separate study before and can become the basis for further study of the peculiarities of the relationship between the authors.

1. Altshuller, M. G. (2014). Nikolai Petrovich Nikolev (“Russian Milton”). In: Altshuller, M. G. In the Shadow of Derzhavin: Literary Portraits. St. Petersburg: Pushkin House publ., pp. 225–468 (in Russ.).

2. Maltseva, T. V. (2018). Reflection of the Creative Individualities’ Relationships in the Literary Discourse of the 18th Century: Sumarokov vs. Nikolev. In: Art Logos, 3 (5), 30–42 (in Russ.).

3. Lappo-Danilevsky, K. Yu. (2024). The Literary Circle of Lvov and Derzhavin (Participants and Chronology). In: 18th Century. Collection 31. Moscow: St. Petersburg: Alliance-Archeo publ., pp. 228–264 (in Russ.).

4. Zapadov, A. V. (1947). Comic Opera [of the Second Half of the 18th Century]. In: History of Russian Literature. Vol. 4: Literature of the 18th Century. Pt. 2. Moscow: Leningrad: The USSR Academy of Sciences publ., pp. 284–295 (in Russ.).

5. Nemirovskaya, I. D. (2008). Poetics of Russian Comic Opera of the 18th Century. In: Scientific Notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities, 6, 38–47 (in Russ.).

6. Stepanov, V. P. (1978). On the History of Literary Polemics of the 18th Century (“The Midas Dinner”). In: Yearbook of the Manuscript Department of the Pushkin House, 1976. Leningrad: Nauka publ., pp. 131–146 (in Russ.).

7. Veselova, A. Yu. & Guskov, N. A. (2003). Ya. B. Knyazhnin’s Comedies. In: Knyazhnin, Ya. B. Comedies and Comic Operas. St. Petersburg: Hyperion publ., pp. 3–54 (in Russ.).

8. Afanasyeva, N. S. (2024). Zoilus Versus the Rhyme Thief: On the Literary Relationships Between I. A. Krylov and Ya. B. Knyazhnin. In: Two Centuries of the Russian Classics, 6 (4), 22–37. DOI: 10.22455/2686-7494-2024-6-4-22-37 (in Russ.).