Preview

Russian Studies in Philology

Advanced search

PERCEPTION AS A NARRATIVE CATEGORY IN MIKHAIL SHISHKIN’S LARIONOV’S REMINISCENCES AND PISMOVNIK

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7278-2023-1-108-115

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of the paper is to identify modernist principles of composing a text in modern Russian literature or, to be exact, to identify a tendency for a narrative to be based on perception rather than actions.

Methodology. The research investigates narrative structures of Mikhail Shishkin’s Larionov’s Reminiscences (One Night Befalls Us All, 1993) and Pismovnik (2010). The quality of these structures correlates with theoretical ideas of José Ortega y Gasset and Vladimir Weidle who postulated the crucial change in the quality of an early 20th century literature narrative (they claimed that a traditional plot was replaced with 1a sequence of subjective perceptual images). It also investigates syntax and tropes of Shishkin’s novels.

Results. The results of the study are the identification of perceptual images replacing traditional actions in Shishkin’s novels. It is shown that the character’s perception influences the syntax (nominal sentences and simple sentences with a predicate describing a subject’s quality predominate) and tropes (metaphors and similes make highly subjective perceptual image) of novels.

Research implications. The research results contribute to the theory of a narrative change in the 20th and 21st century literature.

About the Author

G. A. Savelyev
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Gleb A. Savelyev – Postgraduate student, Department of Russian Literature of 20th Century, Lomonosov

Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991



References

1. Abisheva U. K. Neorealizm v russkoi literature 1900–1910-kh godov [Neorealism in Russian literature of the 1900–1910s.]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2005. 284 p.

2. Weidle W. The Dying of Art (Rus. ed.: Tolmachyov V. M., comp. Umiranie iskusstva. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2001. 447 p.).

3. Ginzburg L. O psikhologicheskoi proze [About Psychological Prose]. Leningrad, Hudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1976. 448 p.

4. Ledenev A. V. [Sensory Reactivity as a Property of Mikhail Shishkin’s Poetics]. In: Skotnickaya A., Svezhy Ya., eds. Znakovye imena sovremennoi russkoi literatury: Mihail Shishkin [Symbolic Names of Modern Russian Literature: Mikhail Shishkin]. Krakov, SCRIPTUM Publ., 2017, pp. 131–146.

5. Mal’tsev Yu. V. Ivan Bunin, 1870–1953 [Ivan Bunin, 1870–1953]. Moscow, Posev Publ., 1994. 432 p.

6. Skotnicka A. [Between Loss and Hope. The Book of Books by Mikhail Shishkin]. In: Skotnickaya A., Svezhy Ya., eds. Znakovye imena sovremennoi russkoi literatury: Mihail Shishkin [Symbolic Names of Modern Russian Literature: Mikhail Shishkin]. Krakov, SCRIPTUM Publ., 2017. Krakov: SCRIPTUM, 2017, pp. 65–88.

7. Solntseva N. M. Ivan Shmelyov. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo: Zhizneopisanie [Ivan Shmelev. Life and Work: Biography]. Moscow, Ellis Lak Publ., 2007. 512 p.

8. Ortega y Gasset J. The Aesthetic. Philosophy of Culture. Dehumanization of Art. What is Philosophy? (Rus. ed.: Bagno V. E., comp. Estetika. Filosofiya kul’tury. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1991. 588 p.).


Review

Views: 104


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5016 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5008 (Online)