COGNITIVE-ASSOCIATIVE STRUCTURE OF A PROPER NAME
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7278-2022-5-32-41
Abstract
Aim. We analyze manifestations of the “psychic” semantics of the subject, namely its reflexive association with the onym as a stimulus.
Methodology. The research is based on the results of an onomastic associative experiment, the purpose of which is to determine reflexive-associative reactions to such toponyms as Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Krasnodar. We identify and describe reflexive associations forming a certain onomastic concept as a mental structure, which is a model of the speaker’s orientation in the world at some part of the linguistic picture.
Results. All manifestations of the reflexive association on the onym as a stimulus are classified as follows: nomenclature, geographical location, regional identification, sights, famous personalities, social opportunities, physiological perception, emotional and social perception, and folklore association.
Research implications. Analysis of each selected category reflects the relationship between the use of proprietary and common vocabulary, depending on what associations arise in the process of the recipient’s mental activity.
About the Authors
T. V. Fedotova
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I. T. Trubilin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Fedotova– Dr. Sci. (Philological Sciences), Assoc. Prof., Prof., Department of the Russian Language and Speech Communication
imeni Kalinina 13, Krasnodar 350044, Krasnodar Region
T. T. Cherkashina
Kosygin State University (Technologies. Design. Art)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana T. Cherkashina – Dr. Sci. (Philological Sciences), Prof., Head of the Department, Department of the Russian Language
Sadovnicheskaya 33 stroenie 1, Moscow 115035
References
1. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the Human World]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p.
2. Boldyrev N. N. [The Concept and Meaning of the Word]. In: Sternin I. A., ed. Metodologicheskie problemy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. Voronezh, Voronezh State University, 2001, pp. 25–36.
3. Bondaletov V. D. Russkaya onomastika [Russian Onomastics]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1983. 224 p.
4. Korneva V. V. [Nominative Strategies as a Reflection of the Features of the Spatial Thinking of an Ethnos]. In: Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 2008, no. 3, pp. 77–81.
5. Kolshansky G. V. [Principles and Methods of Semantic Research]. In: Printsipy i metody semanticheskikh issledovanii [Some Issues of the Semantics of the Language in the Epistemological Aspect]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976, pp. 5–81.
6. Kubryakova E. S. Nominativnyi aspekt rechevoi deyatel’nosti [Nominative Aspect of Speech Activity]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2008. 156 p.
7. Kubryakova E. S. [Setting of Cognitive Science and Actual Problems of Cognitive Linguistics]. In: Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Problems of Cognitive Linguistics], 2004, no. 1, pp. 6–17.
8. Lekova P. A. [Linguo-cognitive Approach to the Analysis of Onyms in the Modern Scientific Paradigm]. In: Vestnik Maikopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University], 2010, no. 2, pp. 24–49.
9. Piotrovsky R. G. Lingvisticheskii avtomat (v issledovanii i nepreryvnom obuchenii) [Linguistic Automaton (In Research and Continuous Learning)]. St. Petersburg, Russian State Pedagogical University Publ., 1999. 256 p.
10. Robustova V. V. [Dictionary of Russian Onomastic Terminology]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 2014, no. 1, pp. 41–49.
11. Sokolova O. V. [Frame Category in Cognitive Linguistics]. In: Vestnik Astrahanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Astrakhan State Technical University], 2007, no. 1, pp. 236–239.
12. Suprun V. I. [Functional and Associative Onomastics]. In: Onomastika Povolzh’ya: materialy XVII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, g. Velikii Novgorod, 17–20 sentyabrya 2019 g. [Onomastics of the Volga Region: Materials of the 17th International Scientific Conference, Veliky Novgorod, September 17–20, 2019]. Veliky Novgorod, Pechatnyi Dvor Publ., 2019, pp. 100–105.
13. Suprun V. I. Onomasticheskoe pole russkogo yazyka i ego khudozhestvenno-esteticheskii potentsial [Onomastic field of the Russian language and its artistic and aesthetic potential]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2000. 172 p.
14. Fedotova T. V. [Culturally Significant Meanings of Emporonyms in the Aspect of the Theory of Reference]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice], 2015, no. 9 (51), pt. 1, pp. 181–183.
15. Shcherbak A. S. [Onomastic Categories: Correlation of Linguistic and Cognitive Structures]. In: Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Problems of Cognitive Linguistics], 2012, no. 4, pp. 78–83.
16. Shcherbak A. S., Kazankova A. A. [Lexical Groupings of Words: The Relationship between the Linguistic and Onomastic Picture of the World]. In: Neofilologiya [Neophilology], 2017, no. 4 (12), pp. 42–49.
17. Shcherbak A. S. [The Universal Property of the Urbanonymic Category]. In: Neofilologiya [Neophilology], 2018, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 5–11.
Review
Views:
160
Email this article 