ON THE SPECIFICITY OF WOMEN’S PROSE
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7278-2022-3-105-111
Abstract
Aim. The aim of the study is to establish the modern views on women’s prose as a phenomenon of the literature of the XX–XXI century.
Methodology. Several approaches to the concept of women’s prose are considered. Use is made of descriptive and comparative methods, as well as of a set-theoretic approach.
Results. It is shown that women’s prose is actively developing and has several typical features that manifest themselves not only as idiosyncratic ones: expressiveness, psychologism, attention to off-plot elements, parables, intertextuality, a combination of social and deeply personal, intimate, cruel realism, lyricism, etc.
Research implications. The work is of practical importance for the formation of an idea of the gender type of prose as an evolving direction in modern literature.
About the Author
E. Fesenko
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov Branch in Severodvinsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Emilia Ya. Fesenko – Cand. Sci. (Philological Sciences), Prof., Associate Prof., Department of Literature and Russian Language
ul. Kapitana Voronina 6, Severodvinsk 164500, Arkhangelsk Region
References
1. Antipina E. S., Gileva A. M. [The Phenomenon of “Women’s Prose” in Modern Russian Literature]. In: Global and Regional Research, 2020, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–204.
2. Gorzhaya A. A. [Psychological Female Prose as an Object of Research]. In: Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya [Humanitarian and Legal Research], 2020, no. 2, pp. 175–181.
3. Zorin A. [Cooler, Cooler, Cooler... The History of Victory: Gallows Humor in the Culture of Recent Years]. In: Znamya [Banner], 1992, no. 10, pp. 198–199.
4. Ivanova N. [Burning Dove. “Vulgarity” as an Aesthetic Phenomenon]. In: Znamya [Banner], 1991, no. 8, pp. 211–223.
5. Kilyakov V. [About Women in Modern Literature]. In: Literaturnaya ucheba [Literary Studies], 1996, no. 4, pp. 69–197.
6. Kolondaeva N. A. [The Archetype of the Leningrad Apartment in the Novels of E. S. Chizhova]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Russkaya filologiya [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian Philology], 2021, no. 5, pp. 100–105.
7. Moskovkina E. A. [On the Issue of “Women’s Prose” in the Latest Russian Literature]. In: Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya nauki, tekhniki i tekhnologii: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Kemerovo, 29 fevralya 2016 g. [Priority Directions for the Development of Science, Technology and Technology: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kemerovo, February 29, 2016]. Kemerovo, West Siberian Scientific Center Publ., 2016, pp. 206–211.
8. Popova I. M., Lyubeznaya E. V. [Phenomena of “Women’s Prose”]. In: Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tambov State Technical University], 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1020–1024.
9. Chuprinin S. Russkaya literatura segodnya: Zhizn po ponyatiyam [Russian Literature Today: Life by the Codes]. Moscow, Vremya Publ., 2007. 768 p.
10. Chuprinin S. [The Thirteenth Opinion, or the “Banner” after 1996]. In: Znamya [Banner], 1997, no. 1, pp. 205–211.
11. Epshtein M. [Proto-, or the End of Postmodernism]. In: Znamya [Banner], 1996, no. 3, pp. 196–209.
12. Goscilo H. Dehexing Sex: Russian Womanhood During and After Glasnost. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1996. 183 p.
Review
Views:
196
Email this article 