Axiology of Desires in the System of Values of a Russian Person (Based on the Novel by M. A. Sholokhov “They Fought for Their Homeland”)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5008-2025-3-8-17
Abstract
Aim. To consider the axiological orientation of the means of representing desires in the context of the value hierarchy of the individual based on the text of the novel by M. A. Sholokhov “They Fought for their Homeland”.
Methodology. The subject of the study in the article is the value characteristics of the representational system of the concept DESIRE and linguistic units with the semantics of the same name in the author’s speech and in the lines of the characters of the above-mentioned work. There are identified and analyzed multilevel language means, grammatical and lexical-syntactic, demonstrating the axiological potential of the concept and working to create an artistic image. During the research there were used methods of observation, generalization, interpretation of results and discourse analysis.
Results. A significant fragment of the individual-author’s conceptual sphere of M. A. Sholokhov, reflecting the value attitudes of the individual, is presented from a new perspective, it is determined the axiological component of the concept DESIRE, it is established the role of sentences containing multilevel verbalizers of this concept, embodying the value system of the novel’s heroes – Russian soldiers, there are systematized the means of the category of optativity, with the help of which the mechanism of creating an artistic image in the idiostyle of M. A. Sholokhov is realized.
Research implications. The results of the research make it possible to identify the linguaxiological component of the means of expressing the desires of an individual on the original text material, which has not previously been subjected to such an analysis, to designate their value potential, and expand and supplement the idea of the possibilities of the language and style of M. A. Sholokhov.
About the Author
E. V. Altabayeva
Moscow State Pedagogical University; A. S. Griboyedov Moscow University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Altabayeva – Dr. Sci. (Philology), Prof., Honorary Figure of Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Prof.; Prof., Department of Humanities and Special Disciplines of the Faculty of Journalism
Moscow
References
1. Milovanova, M. S., ed. (2022). General and Russian linguaxiology: collective monograph. Yaroslavl: Kanzler Publ. (in Russ.).
2. Balashova, S. E. (2008). Types and functions of repetitions in the works of M. A. Sholokhov [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).
3. Vaganov, A. V. (1992). Comparisons in the language of the works of M. A. Sholokhov. Rostov on Don: Rostov State University Publ. (in Russ.).
4. Gavrilova, G. F. (2012). Polysemy of interrogative constructions and their functioning in the language of the works of M. Sholokhov. In: Bulletin of the Southern Federal University. Philological sciences, 2, 58–67 (in Russ.).
5. Krylova, M. N. (2013). Expression of the linguistic personality of M. A. Sholokhov through comparative constructions based on the material of “Tales of the Don.” In: Prospects of Science and Education, 6, 166–169 (in Russ.).
6. Kamagina, I. V. (2020). Simple elliptical sentences: structure, semantics, stylistics (based on the novel by M. A. Sholokhov “Quiet Flows the Don”): [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).
7. Olkhovskaya, E. S. (2011). Composites in M. Sholokhov’s novel “Quiet Flows the Don”: structural-semantic, word-formation and stylistic aspects. In: Bulletin of the Southern Federal University. Philological sciences, 4, 79–87 (in Russ.).
8. Rybalchenko, E. A. (2011). Color vocabulary in the language of M. A. Sholokhov’s novel “Quiet Flows the Don” [dissertation]. Moscow (in Russ.).
9. Altabaeva, E. V. (2021). Optativity in the Russian language: a comprehensive description. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University Publ. (in Russ.).
10. Kolesov, V. V. (2004). The concept of culture: image – concept – symbol. In: Kolesov, V. V. Word and deed. From the history of Russian words. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publ., pp. 57–72 (in Russ.).
11. Ivin, A. A. (1970). Foundations of the logic of assessments. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ. (in Russ.).
12. Altabaeva, E. V. (2023). Optativity as a multi-aspect category of natural language. In: Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian Philology, 3, 26–35. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7278-2023-3-26-35 (in Russ.).
13. Lekant, P. A. (2007). On the issue of modal varieties of sentences. In: Lekant, P. A. Grammatical categories of words and sentences. Moscow: Moscow Region State University Publ., pp. 95–104 (in Russ.).
14. Lekant, P. A. (2007). Rational and emotional in a Russian sentence: semantics of emotional state. In: Lekant, P. A. Grammatical categories of words and sentences. Moscow: Moscow Region State University Publ., pp. 201–206 (in Russ.).
15. Kolesov, V. V. (2006). Russian mentality in language and text. St. Petersburg: Petersburg Oriental Studies Publ. (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
36
Email this article 