Preview

Russian Studies in Philology

Advanced search

Retardation in Drama (To Clarify the Concept)

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5008-2025-1-110-121

Abstract

Aim. To assess the terminological status of compositional techniques of retardation in relation to drama considering the ways of introducing artistic techniques into plays; to attempt to give this technique the status of a working concept through offering its own definition which can serve as a reliable tool for analysing dramatic works.
Methodology. The key research method was a comparative analysis of interpretations of retardation in linguistic, literary, and theatrical dictionary-encyclopedic publications, in their connection with epic drama of A. Ostrovsky. Taking into account these interpretations, and relying on the works of theorists (A. Veselovsky, V. Shklovsky, L. Chernets, L. Tyutelova), our definition of retardation was proposed.
Results. The article proves the indefinite status of the concept of “retardation” in the theory of drama, owing also to the synonymous polyphony in the use of the term. It substantiates both plot and off-plot methods of introducing retardation into a play, in close connection with the technique of exclusion. It also defines the terminological framework of this concept in a narrow sense.
Research implications. The significance lies in the possible application of the results to the analysis of dramatic works, including the modern ones, due to the increasing emphasis on their narrative elements.

About the Author

A. I. Lebedeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Anastasiia I. Lebedeva – Postgraduate Student, Department of Literary Theory in Faculty of Philology

Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991



References

1. Barboy Yu. M. [Theater and Problems of Postdramatism]. In: Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 2016, no. 5, pp. 288–295.

2. Veselovsky A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical Poetics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 405 p.

3. Dobin E. S. Syuzhet i dejstvitel’nost’. Iskusstvo detail [Plot and Reality. The Art of Detail]. Leningrad, Sovetskij pisatel Publ., 1981. 431 p.

4. Zhilicheva G. A., Zhilichev P. E. [Event Retardation as the Basis of the Absurd Discourse (A Case Study of the Works of D. Danilov)]. In: Sibirskij filologicheskij zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Philology], 2023, no. 3, pp. 182–196. DOI 10.17223/18137083/84/13

5. Stakhorsky S. [Narratives of theatrical dramaturgy and their screen reflections (diegesis and ekphrasis)]. In: Voprosy teatra [Voprosy teatra], 2019, no. 3–4, pp. 412–435.

6. Tamarchenko N. D. Russkij klassicheskij roman XIX veka. Problemy poetiki i tipologii zhanra [Russian classical novel of the 19th century. Problems of poetics and typology of the genre]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 1997. 203 p.

7. Tyupa V. I. Gorizonty istoricheskoj narratologii [Horizons of historical narratology]. Moscow, Aletejya Publ., 2021. 270 p.

8. Tyutelova L. G. [Epic in Russian drama of the XIXth century (exemplified by A. N. Ostrovsky’s plays)]. In: Sfera kul’tury [Sphere of Culture], 2023, no. 3 (13), pp. 35–42. DOI: 10.48164/2713-301X_2023_13_35

9. Chernets L. V. [On the Denouements and the Last Cue of A. N. Ostrovsky’s Plays]. In: Stephanos, 2020, iss. 5 (43), pp. 9–17. DOI: 10.24249/2309-9917-2020-43-5-9-17

10. Shklovsky V. B. O teorii prozy [On the Theory of Prose]. Moscow, Federaciya Publ., 1929. 266 p.

11. Flatt T. Narrative Desire and the Limits of Lament in Homer. In: The Classical Journal, 2017, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 385–404.

12. Jong I. F. de. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. 627 p.


Review

Views: 150


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5016 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5008 (Online)