The Problem of Typology of Film Texts in the Aspect of Their Precedence
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5008-2024-3-93-102
Abstract
Aim. To reveal how the precedent phenomenon differs from reminiscence and allusion, to present its own classification of the precedent phenomena of the Soviet and Russian film text.
Methodology. Based on a comparative analysis of the definitions of “allusion”, “reminiscence”, “precedent phenomenon”, their differences were revealed and the functions of these phenomena in the text were determined. Based on the typological method, it was determined that a linguistic personality should be well prepared for the perception of film texts or various creolized texts.
Results. The classification of the precedent phenomena of the Russian and Soviet film texts has been compiled, the source of origin has been determined, and a specific example has been given.
Research implications. The results of the study contribute to the study of intertextuality and precedent units.
About the Author
P. I. Trofimchuk
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Polina I. Trofimchuk – Postgraduate Student, Department of Slavic Studies, General Linguistics and Culture of Communication
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Belonozhko N. D. Allyuziya kak ocenochnoe sredstvo yazyka: na materiale anglijskogo yazyka: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Allusion as an Evaluative Means of Language: On the Material of the English Language: Cand. Sci. Thesis in Philological Sciences]. Moscow, 2013. 150 p.
2. Bobyreva E. V. [Religious Communication: Content Space and Main Characteristics of Religious Discourse]. In: Sovremennye problemy lingvistiki i metodiki prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka v vuze i shkole [Modern Problems of Linguistics and Methods of Teaching the Russian Language at Universities and Schools], 2009, no. 7, pp. 90–100.
3. Vashunina I. V. Kreolizovannyj tekst: smyslovoe vospriyatie [Creolized Text: Semantic Perception]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics RAS Publ., 2020. 206 p.
4. Vorontsova Yu. A. Reminiscencii v tekstah sovremennyh sredstv massovoj informacii: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Reminiscences in the Texts of Modern Media: Cand. Sci. Thesis in Philological Sciences]. Belgorod, 2004. 233 p.
5. Vysotskaya I. V. [Controversial Issues in the Theory of Precedent]. In: Kritika i semiotika [Criticism and Semiotics], 2013, no. 1, pp. 117–137.
6. Galperin I. R. Tekst kak ob»ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an Object of Linguistic Research]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2020. 137 p.
7. Golubeva N. A. [About Development of Vectors of Precedent Linguistics]. In: Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 2020, no. 3, pp. 92–103.
8. Yevgenyeva N. A. [Functions of Reminiscence as a Form of Manifestation of Intertextuality]. In: Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], 2013, no. 11 (160), pp. 101–105.
9. Zolotukhina E. N. Kategoriya intertekstual’nosti v sovremennom russkom yazyke: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [The Category of Intertextuality in the Modern Russian language: Cand. Sci. Thesis in Philological Sciences]. Kaluga, 2009. 207 p.
10. Krasnyh V. V. [System of Precedent Phenomena in the Context of Modern Research]. In: Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikaciya [Language, Consciousness, Communication], 1997, no. 2, pp. 5–13.
11. Kolokoltseva T. N., Moskvin V. P. Intertekstual’nost’ i figury interteksta v diskursah raznyh tipov [Intertextuality and Figures of Intertext in Discourses of Different Types]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2021. 352 p.
12. Leontyev A. A. Prikladnaya psiholingvistika rechevogo obshcheniya i massovoj kommunikacii [Applied Psycholinguistics of Speech Communication and Mass Communication]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2019. 271 p.
13. Lunkova L. N. Tekst: intellektual’noe dezha-vyu [Text: Intellectual Deja Vu]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2018. 238 p.
14. Moskvin V. P. [Intertextuality: Category Apparatus and Typology]. In: Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [News of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 2013, no. 6 (81), pp. 54–61.
15. Rayfield D. Anton Chekhov – A Life (Rus. ed.: Makarova O., transl. Zhizn’ Antona Chekhova. Moscow, KoLibri Publ., 2014. 896 p.).
16. Smirnov E. S., Kolobaev P. A. [Intertextuality and Features of Its Realisation in the “Spiritual Diary” Speech Genre (by the Material of Texts by the Protopresbyter A. Schmemann): A Theolinguistic Aspect]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philologiy. Theory & Practice], 2022, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3886–3891.
17. Suprun A. E. [Text Reminiscences as a Linguistic Phenomenon]. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of Linguistics], 1995, no. 6, pp. 17–29.
18. Fateeva N. A. Intertekst v mire tekstov: Kontrapunkt intertekstual’nosti [Intertext in the World of Texts: Counterpoint of Intertextuality]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007. 280 p.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
79
Email this article 