SEMANTICS OF PERCEPTION: WHAT YOU CAN SEE OUT OF THE CORNER OF YOUR EYE AND HEAR OUT OF THE CORNER OF YOUR EAR
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5008-2023-4-46-57
Abstract
Aim. To analyze of the features of semantics and functioning of linguistic units out of the corner of the eye and out of the corner of the ear and comparison of the results of this analysis with scientific and common ideas about peripheral visual and auditory perception.
Methodology. The semantics, compatibility and use of expressions (to see) out of the corner of the eye, (to hear) out of the corner of the ear are analyzed. In the course of the study, the methods of component, collocation, contextual analysis were applied.
Results. The semantic specificity and trends in the use of each of these expressions are revealed, the conclusion is made about the weakness of the traditional assessment of peripheral visual and auditory perception as merely superficial and accidental.
Research implications. The work contributes to the linguistic study of perception processes, its results can be considered in research on cognitive semantics and construction grammar.
About the Author
L. V. Kalinina
Vyatka State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr . Sci . (Philological Sciences), Assoc . Prof ., Prof ., Department of Russian Language, Culture of Speech and Teaching Methods
ul. Moskovskaya 36, Kirov 610000
References
1. Avdevnina O. Yu. Situaciya vospriyatiya v aspekte eyo sintaksicheskogo i hudozhestvennogo modelirovaniya [The Situation of Perception in the Aspect of Its Syntactic and Artistic Modeling]. Saratov, Saratov State Law Academy Publ., 2022. 416 p.
2. Boldyrev N. N. Yazyk i sistema znanij. Kognitivnaya teoriya yazyka [Language and Knowledge System. Cognitive Theory of Language]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury Publ., 2019. 480 p.
3. Danilova N. K. [Mode Semantics and the Subject of Utterance]. In: Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], 2011, no. 11 (130), pp. 77–82.
4. Drenyova A. A. Obshchie tendencii i individual’nye variacii ekstrafoveal’nogo vospriyatiya geometricheskih figur: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk [General Trends and Individual Variations of Extrafoveal Perception of Geometric Figures: Abstract of Cand. Sci. Thesis in Psychological Sciences]. Moscow, 2021. 34 p.
5. Efanova L. G. [Semantics of Measures and Norms in the Meanings of Derived Units]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. [Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Philology], 2009, no. 4 (8), pp. 5–19.
6. Iriskhanova O. K. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya [Focus Games in Language. Semantics, Syntax and Pragmatics of Defocusing]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury Publ., 2014. 320 p.
7. Kalinina L. V. [Between Typical and Imperceptible: “Quantum Effects” of Categorization]. In: Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Language Studies], 2020, no. 2 (41), pp. 232–236.
8. Klyushina A. M. [[The Relationship between the Concepts of Extreme and Limit]. In: Mir nauki. Sociologiya, filologiya, kul’turologiya [World of Science. Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies], 2022, vol. 13, no. 3. Available at: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/04FLSK322.pdf (accessed: 01.06.2023).
9. Kolesov I. Y. [On the Cognitive Approach in the Grammar of Constructions]. In: Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Language Studies], 2020, no. 2 (41), pp. 101–105.
10. Kolodyazhnaya V. N., Trubaeva E. I. [Adverbs of Incompleteness of an Action / Feature as Evaluative Units of the English Language]. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice], 2017, no. 3–2 (69), pp. 116–118.
11. Kravchenko A. V. Yazyk i vospriyatie: Kognitivnye aspekty yazykovoj kategorizacii [Language and Perception: Cognitive Aspects of Language Categorization]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University Publ., 2004. 206 p.
12. Kuznetsov A. M. [Word Meaning in Explanatory Dictionaries and Its Psychological Validity for Native Speakers]. In: Chelovek: obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty [Human Being: Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects], 2015, no. 1, pp. 160–168.
13. Anan’eva K. I., Barabanshchikov V. A., Demidov A. A., eds. Lico cheloveka v prostranstve obshcheniya [The Person’s Face in the Space of Communication]. Moscow, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis Publ., Kogito-Centr Publ., 2016. 430 p.
14. Rahilina E. V. Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyh imyon: semantika i sochetaemost’ [Cognitive Analysis of Subject Names: Semantics and Compatibility]. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 2000. 416 p.
15. Rozhkova G. I., Belokopytov A. V., Iomdina E. N. [Present View of the Human Peripheral Vision Specifics]. In: Sensornye sistemy [Sensory Systems], 2019, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 305–330.
16. Skrebcova T. G. Kognitivnaya lingvistika: klassicheskie teorii, novye podhody [Cognitive Linguistics: Classical Theories, New Approaches]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury Publ., 2018. 392 p.
17. Uryson E. V. Problemy issledovaniya yazykovoj kartiny mira: Analogiya v semantike [Problems of Studying the Language Picture of the World: Analogy in Semantics]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury Publ., 2003. 224 p.
18. Frith C. Making up the Mind (Rus. ed.: Petrov P., transl. Mozg i dusha: kak nervnaya deyatel’nost’ formiruet nash vnutrennij mir. Moscow, AST Publ., CORPUS Publ., 2020. 335 p.).
Review
Views:
87
Email this article 