THE COMIC IN THE F. DOSTOEVSKYS WORKS IN THE ESTIMATES OF NATIONAL STUDY OF LITERATURE
Abstract
The author of the article explored the
issue of the comic in the works of Fyodor Dostoevsky
in Russian literary criticism. Belinsky was one of the
fi rst who pointed out the comic talent of Dostoevsky. In
the early 20th century in the center of literary research
was often the question of combining the comic with
the tragic (Belinsky), parody in the early Dostoevskys
works (Tynyanov), carnivalesque laughter dominant of
polyphonic structure of the novels (Bakhtin). Along with
the features of humor, irony and satire the author also
studied the personality of the writer, the place of the
comic in its artistic and aesthetic concepts. Bright, good
humor in the early works of Dostoevsky and complication
of the structure of the comic in later novels is still an
important issue in contemporary literary criticism. From
Poor Folk to The Brothers Karamazov comic element
is inherent in the creative method of the writer.
issue of the comic in the works of Fyodor Dostoevsky
in Russian literary criticism. Belinsky was one of the
fi rst who pointed out the comic talent of Dostoevsky. In
the early 20th century in the center of literary research
was often the question of combining the comic with
the tragic (Belinsky), parody in the early Dostoevskys
works (Tynyanov), carnivalesque laughter dominant of
polyphonic structure of the novels (Bakhtin). Along with
the features of humor, irony and satire the author also
studied the personality of the writer, the place of the
comic in its artistic and aesthetic concepts. Bright, good
humor in the early works of Dostoevsky and complication
of the structure of the comic in later novels is still an
important issue in contemporary literary criticism. From
Poor Folk to The Brothers Karamazov comic element
is inherent in the creative method of the writer.
References
1. Бахтин М. М. Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. - Изд-е 3-е. - М.: Художественная литература, 1972. - 320 с.
2. Белинский В. Г. Собр. соч: В 9 т. - М.: Худ. лит., 1982. - Т. 8. - 450 с.
3. Бицилли П. М. К вопросу о внутренней форме романа Достоевского // О Достоевском. Сб. ст. 1966. - 120 с.
4. Достоеский Ф. М. Полное собрание сочинений в 30 томах. - Л; 1972 -1990. - Т. 29. - 661 с.
5. Достоевский в воспоминаниях современников. М., 1964. - Т. 2. - 662 с.
6. Достоевский Ф.М. в русской критике. - М., 1959. - Т. 1. - 537 с.
7. Заславский Д. О. Заметки о юморе и сатире в произведениях Достоевского // Творчество До- стоевского: Сб. ст. - М., 1959. - 765 с.
8. Ильин И. А. Собрание сочинений: В 10 т. Т. 6. Кн. III / Сост. И коммент. Ю. Т. Лисицы. - М.; 1997. - 560 с.
9. Кашина Н. В. Эстетика Ф. М. Достоевского. - М.; 1989. - 248 с.
10. Лапшин И. И. Комическое в произведениях До- стоевского // О Достоевском: Сб. ст./ Под ред. А. Л. Бема. - Прага, 1993. - 567 с.
11. Манн Т. Русская антология // Литературная га- зета. - 1975. - № 23.
12. Мережковский Д.С. Толстой и Достоевский. СПб., 1909. - 588 с.
13. Назиров Р. Г. Юмор Достоевского // Русская ли- тература 1870-1890 гг. - Свердловск, 1977. - Вып. 10. - 176 с.
14. Розанов В. В. Легенда о Великом Инквизиторе Ф.М. Достоевского (Опыт критического ком- ментария.) // О Великом Инквизиторе. Достоев- ский и последующие. - М., 1991. - 578 с.
15. Словарь литературоведческих терминов / под ред. Белокуровой С. П. - СПб.: 2007. - 782 с.
16. Тынянов Ю.Н. Достоевский и Гоголь: к теории пародии // О Достоевском. - 1966. - 458 с.
17. Фридлендер Г. М. Достоевский в современном мире // Достоевский: Материалы и исследова- ния. -Вып. 1. - СПб; 1974. - 309 с.
18. Чирков Н. М. О стиле Достоевского. - М., 1967. - 302 с.
Review
Views:
76
Email this article 