SPEECH EXPLICATION OF THE CONCEPT OF STUBBORNNESS IN NEWSPAPER TEXTS: ANALYSIS OF VERBAL-OBJECT CONSTRUCTIONS
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7278-2022-2-48-54
Abstract
Aim. The aim of the paper is to reveal the peculiarities of the explication of the semantic content of the concept of ‘stubbornness’ in the texts of the Russian media.
Methodology. Based on the analysis of the semantic characteristics of verbal-nominal combinations with the word stubbornness, a series of cognitive features of the concept of ‘stubbornness’ are identified. The research relies on the methods of description, classification and generalization, as well as semantic-cognitive analysis and contextual analysis.
Results. The study makes it possible to reveal different aspects of the content of the concept of ‘stubbornness’: not only the essential characteristics of stubbornness, its possession and development in a person, and the source of acquisition, but also the relationship of stubbornness with other similar qualities, and types and degrees of its manifestation, as well as the evaluative attitude of people to stubbornness.
Research implications. The materials and results of the research can be used in the practice of teaching Russian as a foreign language, as well as in theoretical courses in cognitive linguistics, cultural linguistics, lexicology and semantics.
About the Author
Lili XuChina
Xu Lili – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Lecturer, Russian Language Department
Weijin Road 94, Tianjin 30071
References
1. Babenko L. G. [Denotative Space of the Russian Verb: Aspects and Prospects of Study]. In: Denotativnoe prostranstvo russkogo glagola: materialy IX Kuznetsovskikh chtenii, Ekaterinburg, 5–7 fevralya 1998 g. [Denotative Space of the Russian Verb: Materials of the 9th Kuznetsov readings, Yekaterinburg, February 5–7, 1998]. Yekaterinburg, Ural University Publ., 1998, pp. 3–11.
2. Babushkin A. P., Sternin I. A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika i semasiologiya [Cognitive Linguistics and Semasiology]. Voronezh, Ritm Publ., 2018. 229 p.
3. Zubareva E. O. Shustova S. V. [Syntagmatic Analysis of the Concept of “Migration” (Based on Corpus Data)]. In: Migratsionnaya lingvistika [Migration Linguistics], 2019, no. 1, pp. 23–42.
4. Kazachuk I. G. [Object, Objective, Objectivity: The Problem of Interpretation]. In: Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University], 2009, no. 13 (151), pp. 62–65.
5. Konstantinova S. K. [Substantive Representation of the Concept of “Light” in the Lyrics of A. A. Fet: Syntagmatics of Nuclear Lexemes]. In: Kurskoe slovo [Kursk Word], 2020, no. 20, pp. 3–13.
6. Lebedeva N. B. Polisituativnyi analiz glagol’noi semantiki [Polysituational Analysis of Verbal Semantics]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2010. 192 p.
7. Paducheva E. V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki [Dynamic Models in the Semantics of Vocabulary]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury Publ., 2004. 609 p.
8. Plotnikova A. M. Kognitivnye aspekty izucheniya semantiki (na materiale russkikh glagolov) [Cognitive Aspects of the Study of Semantics (Based on Russian Verbs)]. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Publ., 2005. 140 p.
9. Pomerantseva T. P. [Syntagmatic Features of the Language Explication of the Concepts of “Man” and “People”]. In: Ratsiburskaya L. V., ed. Aktivnye processy v sovremennom russkom yazyke: natsional’noe i internatsional’noe [Active Processes in the Modern Russian Language: National and International]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2021, pp. 630–639.
10. Popova T. P. [Semantic Compatibility and Linguocultural Correlations of the Concept of “Tolerance” in the Russian Language Picture of the World]. In: Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University], 2017, no. 2 (15), pp. 47–60.
11. Rakhilina E. V. Kognitivnyi analiz predmetnykh imen: semantika i sochetaemost’ [Cognitive Analysis of Subject Names: Semantics and Compatibility]. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 2008. 416 p.
12. Slyshkin G. G. Ot teksta k simvolu: lingvokul’turnye kontsepty pretsedentnykh tekstov v soznanii i diskurse [From Text to Symbol: Linguistic and Cultural Concepts of Precedent Texts in Consciousness and Discourse]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2000. 128 p.